<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uneconomical Solution: Ricoh GX2500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cartridgesave.co.uk/news/uneconomical-solution-ricoh-gx2500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cartridgesave.co.uk/news/uneconomical-solution-ricoh-gx2500/</link>
	<description>A Refreshing Blend of Printer Technology News, Guides &#38; Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Cowley</title>
		<link>http://www.cartridgesave.co.uk/news/uneconomical-solution-ricoh-gx2500/comment-page-1/#comment-6989</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Cowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartridgesave.co.uk/news/?p=439#comment-6989</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments Peter. You&#039;re right sometimes it&#039;s worth paying a little extra for reliability, quiet operation and print quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Peter. You&#8217;re right sometimes it&#8217;s worth paying a little extra for reliability, quiet operation and print quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.cartridgesave.co.uk/news/uneconomical-solution-ricoh-gx2500/comment-page-1/#comment-6988</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartridgesave.co.uk/news/?p=439#comment-6988</guid>
		<description>We have used this printer for a few years, and yes its expensive to run, but it is so reliable, so quiet and the print quality so high that we just keep shelling out for the cartridges!  You need to live with it to appreciate it.  Don&#039;t always trust reviews!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have used this printer for a few years, and yes its expensive to run, but it is so reliable, so quiet and the print quality so high that we just keep shelling out for the cartridges!  You need to live with it to appreciate it.  Don&#8217;t always trust reviews!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.cartridgesave.co.uk/news/uneconomical-solution-ricoh-gx2500/comment-page-1/#comment-6176</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartridgesave.co.uk/news/?p=439#comment-6176</guid>
		<description>while this printer might not be cheap for photos like any printer it is excellent quality, the autor of this article is an asshole that has not taken the time to properly evaluate this machine, I own one and its great but like a car with a large fuel tank when its time for a refil IT SUCKS, yes you can get cheap waterbased inks for inkjets but they are no match for pigment when it comes to durability. you get what you pay for. for the home user that wants the best this is it !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while this printer might not be cheap for photos like any printer it is excellent quality, the autor of this article is an asshole that has not taken the time to properly evaluate this machine, I own one and its great but like a car with a large fuel tank when its time for a refil IT SUCKS, yes you can get cheap waterbased inks for inkjets but they are no match for pigment when it comes to durability. you get what you pay for. for the home user that wants the best this is it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

